Tag Archives: Parable of the evil workers in the vineyard

God’s Vineyad

Posted on by
Reply

Jesus’ parable of the evil workers in the vineyard (Mat. 21: 33-460 is a real downer. Who likes to listen to a story about workers who mistreat or kill every agent of the owner and then, when the owner sends his only son, they kill the son, thinking they will get the vineyard for themselves?

The Parable is obviously a variant of the love song of the vineyard in Isaiah, (Is. 5: 1–7) where the prophet sings about a vineyard that is set up with everything that is needed, and yet it yields wild grapes. Isaiah’s listeners probably didn’t like being denounced as wild grapes, and Jesus’ listeners obviously didn’t like being called evil workers in the vineyard. Nobody, perhaps especially evil people, like to be called evil, but a person who seeks to do good is wise to heed any warning of pitfalls of falling into evil.

In the flow of Matthew’s Gospel, the story clearly stands as a warning that the Jewish leaders are in danger of committing an act of collective violence that will turn out to be an act against God. As we know, the Jewish leaders, at least most of them, didn’t heed the advice. But focusing on the Jewish leaders of Jesus’ time misses the point of the parable for us. Both Isaiah’s love song and Jesus’ parable stress how God prepares the world for human flourishing and yet humans thwart God’s intent. Isaiah sings of grapes growing wild with hints of social oppression, while Jesus stresses the human tendency to solve social problems through collective violence. In this perspective, the Jewish leaders of Jesus’ time are only one example out of countless others of the fundamental tragedy of collective violence. In our time, one can’t help but also think of the ongoing collective violence on the environment which God provided us and which we are squandering to an alarming degree.

In both the love song and the parable, there is judgment, or threat of judgment, which make both of them pretty grim. But we should note the care that God gives to God’s creation as symbolized by the vineyard. What we are presented with is a loving God who wants us to flourish. But what if we reject the love and care given us? If God’s love is rejected, we are left only with human wrath. The consequences are violent and terrifying.

God’s will for flourishing applies to everyone, not just some or a few. A vineyard does not flourish if some people or somebody is expendable. To drive home this point, Jesus quotes the key verse from Psalm 118 that the stone rejected by the builders has become the cornerstone. In one respect, culture is historically built on the victim. But in a more profound sense, the victim is the missing piece needed to be included for the sake of full human flourishing.

One puzzling detail of the parable is the foolishness of the owner. If every agent has been mistreated, sometimes killed, why send his son into what must clearly be a dangerous situation? But this is what the cosmic owner of the vineyard does. This is the last and final act of caring, to suffer the violence of the workers himself so as he can be the cornerstone for a new culture of full human flourishing. What more proof do we need that God continues to call us back and give us all we need to work the vineyard for the sake of all?

Tending God’s Vineyard

Posted on by
Reply

Cemetary2I have discussed the Parable of the Evil Workers in the Vineyard in my book Moving and Resting in God’s Desire where I suggest that Jesus was warning his listeners of impending collective violence. I also have used this parable as Exhibit A for René Girard’s thesis that humans have a tendency to establish culture in the midst of social crisis through rounding on a victim who is killed or expelled. This time I want to take the parable in a different direction.

The cue for my changed direction is the end of the Parable of the Vineyard in Isaiah 5 on which Jesus’ parable is modeled. In both parables, the owner of the vineyard has taken great trouble to set up the vineyard for maximum productivity, but things still go awry. In Isaiah’s parable, there is not the cycle of violence described in Jesus’ parable, but the well-planted grapes grow wild. The owner (Yahweh) “expected justice, but saw bloodshed; righteousness, but heard a cry!” (Is. 5: 7) Isaiah goes on make it clear that the violence he is complaining about is about those “who join house to house, who add field to field, until there is room for no one but you, and you are left to live alone in the midst of the land!” (Is. 5: 8) We could update this verse by adding those who add company to company and conglomerate to conglomerate.

Bringing this background into Jesus’ parable prods us to understand this parable, too, as referring not only to collective violence such as that threatened against Jesus but the ongoing social violence of the religious and political leaders. Properly tending the vineyard of the Lord is about properly caring for all people in society, especially the poorest and most vulnerable. Jesus was seeing quite the opposite in his time and the Risen Christ continues to see this systemic injustice continuing unabated in our time.

The stone rejected by the builders that Psalm 118 says becomes the cornerstone is rightly taken as referring to the persecuted prophets and then to Jesus who, rejected by the builders of society, has in his Resurrection become the cornerstone of the Church. But when we take into account the concluding parable in Matthew 25, it becomes clear that what is done to “the least of the members” of God’s family is done to Jesus. That is, the weak, the vulnerable, and the poor are the stones rejected by the builders of society, the same builders who put stumbling blocks before those who try to better themselves. But in the eyes of Jesus, it is those rejected by the builders who are the true building blocks of God’s kingdom.

When Jesus asks his listeners what they think the owner of the vineyard will do, they say that the owner “will put those wretches to a miserable death, and lease the vineyard to other tenants who will give him the produce at the harvest time.” (Mt. 21: 41) So it is that those committing social oppression embody an unforgiving attitude. Today, we hear many of the rich and powerful demonize the poor and vulnerable for their situation, blaming the victims of their oppression.

Yet, as Raymund Schwager points out in Jesus in the Drama of Salvation, the risen Christ did not come with vengeance against the evil workers in the vineyard. Instead, the risen Christ came in peace with forgiveness. Those experiencing oppression are often scandalized by the notion of forgiveness, but we see in the unforgiving attitude of the Jewish leaders who are the oppressors that forgiveness is even more scandalizing for them. We often overlook how easy it is to hold unforgiving grudges against those people whom we have wronged in some way. The reason that we blame our victims is because accepting forgiveness from the risen Christ implies acceptance of our own wrong doing. No matter how gentle the Lamb of God is, forgiveness is still an accusation, and accepting forgiveness can only be done in a spirit of penitence. Looked at this way, the gift of forgiveness is not necessarily easy to accept. Yet overcome this difficulty we must if we are to avoid the cycle of violence that the Parable of the Evil Workers warns us against.

[For quotes and references to Moving and Resting in God’s Desire and Raymund Schwager’s Jesus in the Drama of Salvation, see Girardian Reflections on the Lectionary Proper 22A]

[For an introduction fo René Girard see Violence and the Kingdom of God]